Home | Resources | Archives |Contact Us

Carbon Tax Within Our Union

Cap-and-trade, as well as, other CO2 taxes, have been going on in the rest of the world. There has been much speculation on how the United States would deal with this economic quandary. Canada, the European Economic Union, China and India have all been interacting with the U.S. on the matter without much success.

A surprise carbon tariff comes from the state of Minnesota. The tax would not impact foreign countries as much as it would impact their neighboring state, North Dakota. The plan tax is between $4 and $34 per ton of carbon dioxide emissions and is to be added to the cost of coal-fired electricity.

North Dakota is mounting a legal battle against Minnesota because most of North Dakota’s electricity exports are from coal-fired plants.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP)

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a special outreach program for garbage landfills. The program encourages trash dumps to create methane and liquid natural gas.

EPA manager Tom Frankiewicz says, “Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Methane is also the main component of natural gas, so by capturing and using methane as an energy source you get an even bigger bang for the buck.”

“There is growing interest, but because removing impurities from the methane is currently quite expensive, right now it’s only profitable at larger landfills where you have enough landfill gas. With today’s economics, these projects only happen at the biggest sites in the U.S.; the thought is that as the technology becomes cheaper, that will change. ”

One partner in the program, MWH Americas, Inc., states, “At MWH, there is a strong focus on their climate change commitment. Sustainable development activities also cover a range of other issues such as water scarcity, efficiency in the use of resources, biodiversity, and the social, cultural, and environmental impacts of economic development. MWH is committed to working with their clients to reduce their impact on the world and to improve the world’s quality of life. Inspired in part by their company purpose and in part by their invitation to participate in the Clinton Global Initiative, MWH developed a multi-year, multi-faceted Climate Change Commitment aimed at combating climate change and raising awareness of its causes and effects.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Climate Change And The Food We Eat

Environmental Protection Agency — Agriculture is highly sensitive to climate variability and weather extremes, such as droughts, floods and severe storms. The forces that shape our climate are also critical to farm productivity. Human activity has already changed atmospheric characteristics such as temperature, rainfall, levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) and ground level ozone. The scientific community expects such trends to continue. While food production may benefit from a warmer climate, the increased potential for droughts, floods and heat waves will pose challenges for farmers. Additionally, the enduring changes in climate, water supply and soil moisture could make it less feasible to continue crop production in certain regions.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) concluded:

Recent studies indicate that increased frequency of heat stress, droughts and floods negatively affect crop yields and livestock beyond the impacts of mean climate change, creating the possibility for surprises, with impacts that are larger, and occurring earlier, than predicted using changes in mean variables alone. This is especially the case for subsistence sectors at low latitudes. Climate variability and change also modify the risks of fires, pest and pathogen outbreak, negatively affecting food, fiber and forestry.

Climate Factors
Several factors directly connect climate change and agricultural productivity:

Average temperature increase
Change in rainfall amount and patterns
Rising atmospheric concentrations of CO2
Pollution levels such as tropospheric ozone
Change in climatic variability and extreme events
Most agricultural impact studies have considered the effects of one or two aspects of climate change on a particular farming activity. Few, however, have considered the full set of anticipated shifts and their impact on agricultural production across the country.

Average temperature increase: An increase in average temperature can 1) lengthen the growing season in regions with a relatively cool spring and fall; 2) adversely affect crops in regions where summer heat already limits production; 3) increase soil evaporation rates, and 4) increase the chances of severe droughts.

Change in rainfall amount and patterns: Changes in rainfall can affect soil erosion rates and soil moisture, both of which are important for crop yields. The IPCC predicts that precipitation will increase in high latitudes, and decrease in most subtropical land regions—some by as much as about 20 percent. While regional precipitation will vary the number of extreme precipitation events is predicted to increase (IPCC, 2007).

Rising atmospheric concentrations of CO2: Increasing atmospheric CO2 levels, driven by emissions from human activities, can act as a fertilizer and enhance the growth of some crops such as wheat, rice and soybeans. CO2 can be one of a number of limiting factors that, when increased, can enhance crop growth. Other limiting factors include water and nutrient availability. While it is expected that CO2 fertilization will have a positive impact on some crops, other aspects of climate change (e.g., temperature and precipitation changes) may temper any beneficial CO2 fertilization effect (IPCC, 2007).

Pollution levels such as tropospheric ozone: Higher levels of ground level ozone limit the growth of crops. Since ozone levels in the lower atmosphere are shaped by both emissions and temperature, climate change will most likely increase ozone concentrations. Such changes may offset any beneficial yield effects that result from elevated CO2 levels.

Change in climatic variability and extreme events: Changes in the frequency and severity of heat waves, drought, floods and hurricanes, remain a key uncertainty in future climate change. Such changes are anticipated by global climate models, but regional changes and the potential affects on agriculture are more difficult to forecast.

Top of page

Implications for North America
The IPCC concluded that, for North America as a whole (IPCC, 2007):

Moderate climate change will likely increase yields of North American rain fed agriculture, but with smaller increases and more spatial variability than in earlier estimates. Most studies project likely climate-related yield increases of 5-20 percent over the first decades of the century, with the overall positive effects of climate persisting through much or all of the 21st century.
Food production is projected to benefit from a warmer climate, but there probably will be strong regional effects, with some areas in North America suffering significant loss of comparative advantage to other regions.
The U.S. Great Plains/Canadian Prairies are expected to be particularly vulnerable.
Crops that are currently near climate thresholds (e.g., wine grapes in California) are likely to suffer decreases in yields, quality, or both.
Climate change is expected to improve growing conditions for some crops that are limited by length of growing season and temperature. (e.g. fruit production in the Great Lakes region and eastern Canada).
Agriculture in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is expected to be less vulnerable to climate change than agriculture in developing nations, especially in the tropics, where farmers may have a limited ability to adapt. In addition, the effects of climate change on U.S. and world agriculture will depend not only on changing climate conditions, but will also depend on the agricultural sector’s ability to adapt through future changes in technology, changes in demand for food, and environmental conditions, such as water availability and soil quality. Management practices, the opportunity to switch management and crop selection from season to season, and technology can help the agricultural sector cope with and adapt to climatic variability and change.

The U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) has commissioned a federal study on the potential effects of climate change on agriculture. The CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3 will address the following questions:

What factors influencing agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States are sensitive to climate and climate change?
How could changes in climate exacerbate or ameliorate stresses on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity?
What are the indicators of these stresses?
What current and potential observation systems could be used to monitor these indicators?
Can observation systems detect changes in agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity that are caused by climate change, as opposed to being driven by other causal activities?

Top of page

IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Parry, Martin L., Canziani, Osvaldo F., Palutikof, Jean P., van der Linden, Paul J., and Hanson, Clair E. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1000 pp.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed
  • RSS National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration

    • NOAA Scientist Finds Clue to Predicting Solar Flares
      For decades, experts have searched for signs in the sun that could lead to more accurate forecasts of solar flares — powerful blasts of energy that can supercharge Earth’s upper atmosphere and disrupt satellites and the land-based technologies on which modern societies depend. Now a scientist at NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center and her colleagues […]
    • Tsunamis May Telegraph Their Presence
      Tsunamis send electric signals through the ocean that appear to be sensed by the vast network of communication cables on the seabed, according to a new study led by Manoj Nair of the University of Colorado and NOAA. […]
    • NOAA Satellites Help Rescue 195 People in 2009
      NOAA’s fleet of satellites played a vital role in the rescues of 195 people during life-threatening situations throughout the United States and its surrounding waters in 2009. In each incident, NOAA satellites pinpointed these downed pilots, shipwrecked mariners, or stranded hikers by detecting a distress signal from an emergency beacon and relaying the in […]
  • RSS Environmental Protection Agency

    • How Do You Market Behavior Change?
      January is National Radon Action Month, or NRAM. Read more about EPA’s radon activities and what others are doing to reduce their radon exposure. I was buying shampoo yesterday and was, for some reason, drawn to a particular brand I had never bought before. I didn’t realize why I was drawn to this particular product until [...] […]
    • Kids, Creativity and the National Radon Poster Contest
      January is National Radon Action Month, or NRAM. Read more about EPA’s radon activities and what others are doing to reduce their radon exposure. Two months ago, I helped judge the 2010 National Radon Poster Contest. What amazed me most was the amount of creativity in the posters submitted by children, aged 9 to 14. Several times [...] […]
    • Pick 5: Spread the Word!
      Hey Pick 5’ers, it’s time again for you to share what you’ve done and how you did it. If you haven’t done it yet, Pick 5 for the Environment and then come back to comment. Today we cover action #10: Spread the word! Please share your stories as comments below. Over the past several months I’ve done a [...] […]
  • RSS Environment

    • Earthquake Activity
      USGS Magnitude 7.0 – HAITI REGION 2010 January 12 21:53:09 UTC 15 km (10 miles) SW of PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti USGS Magnitude 6.5 – OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 2010 January 10 00:27:39 UTC 37 km (23 miles) WNW (283°) from Ferndale, CA USGS Magnitude 4.1 – SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA 2010 January 07 18:09:35 UTC 10 km (6 miles) ENE (59°) from Mil […]
  • Pages

  • Archives

  • Categories